← Looting & Restitution
ART, LOSS & MEMORY · 1940–2023

The postcard that helped reopen a Kandinsky claim

A 1966 postcard, wartime connections and an unreliable museum inventory entry helped reverse an earlier refusal to return a 1910 painting.

ArtistWassily KandinskyArtworkMurnau mit Kirche II (1910)PlaceEindhoven, Netherlands / London, United KingdomDocumented positionReturned to the Stern-Lippmann heirs
Murnau mit Kirche II by Wassily Kandinsky, formerly held by Eindhoven’s Van Abbemuseum
Murnau mit Kirche II by Wassily Kandinsky, formerly held by Eindhoven’s Van Abbemuseum · Peter Cox, Eindhoven / Dutch Restitutions Committee ↗

A church tower rises above Kandinsky’s patchwork of fields and rooftops in Murnau mit Kirche II. Johanna Margarethe Stern-Lippmann and her husband, Siegbert Samuel Stern, collected the canvas. A family will from 1924 and a prewar photograph supported ownership. Still, the Dutch Restitutions Committee rejected the claim in 2018 because the evidence then available did not sufficiently connect the loss to Nazi rule.

In the reopened investigation, researchers found a postcard mailed in 1966 by Flory Frank-Marburger that pictured the Kandinsky. Her handwritten annotation suggested that she and her husband had once possessed it. He had acted as an intermediary for Stern-Lippmann during the occupation. The committee also checked a competing ownership story in the museum’s records against the dates and papers of the family named there and found the entry unreliable.

The 2022 binding opinion concluded that an involuntary loss during the German occupation was sufficiently plausible. Eindhoven, which had bought the picture in 1951 for the Van Abbemuseum, agreed to return it. Sotheby’s confirmed the restitution and sold the painting for the heirs at its March 2023 London auction.

Artwork Details & DocumentationIdentification, ownership history and supporting records

Individual artwork identification details have not yet been documented in this record. Missing specifications are not inferred from the photograph or report headline.

Not documented in this record: object type · materials & technique · measurements · inscriptions & markings · distinguishing features · artwork title · maker / attribution · creation date / period · subject.

Identification details follow the Object ID categories where documented. Ownership history is recorded separately; this documentation is not an authentication or a certificate of ownership.

Documentary sources

  1. Dutch Restitutions Committee · binding opinion RC 5.178 ↗
  2. Dutch Restitutions Committee · ruling and photograph ↗
  3. Sotheby’s · confirmation of return and sale ↗

An original ArtTraceX synthesis. Sources checked .