The Vampire that came back wounded
A dark embrace, a museum break-in and a scratch: one of Munch’s most unsettling images has a history written into its surface.

The night the image left the museum
On 23 February 1988, Vampire was stolen from the Munch Museum’s old building at Tøyen. The museum dates its return to 22 August of the same year and records a visible scratch. This was not the disappearance of every version of Munch’s composition: the artist repeated the motif in different paintings and graphic works. The image illustrated here is the museum’s 1893 canvas, the specific version whose theft and later treatment are documented. [1]
An embrace already carrying a story
The picture’s dark room and enveloping red hair invite an ominous reading. But the title should not be mistaken for a literal event depicted from life. MUNCH’s account also recalls that in 1932 the artist questioned including Vampire in a book and described it as something of a joke. The uncertainty belongs to interpretation: what seems threatening to one viewer may remain an embrace to another. That visual ambiguity is separate from the well-recorded crime. [3]
Damage did not begin with the theft
By the time conservators approached the canvas again in 2023, they faced several layers of history. Earlier moisture damage had affected the support. A 1957 treatment had lined the painting, filled losses, retouched areas and added varnish. MUNCH identifies that old varnish as a principal problem, rather than attributing every weakness to the 1988 break-in. Removing a later layer was therefore an investigation into the painting’s appearance as well as an act of repair. [2]
A recovery is not the end of a case
Reporting from the conservation studio described microscopy, imaging and careful removal of earlier additions. The work was intended to recover more of Munch’s original visual effect, not to make the canvas look artificially new. Theft, recovery and conservation answer different questions: where the object went, whether it returned, and what happened to its material surface. Here the first disappearance ended in 1988. The later inquiry concerned how to read and preserve a painting that had survived more than one kind of harm. [4][2]
Recovered in 1988; conservation documented
This Vampire was recovered in 1988. The 2023 work addressed both accumulated damage and earlier conservation materials; it was not a new recovery announcement.
Artwork Details & DocumentationIdentification, ownership history and supporting records
Vampire (1893, MUNCH version)
- Object type
- PaintingMUNCH · Collection record MM.M.00292 ↗ · checked
- Maker / attribution
- Edvard MunchMUNCH · Collection record MM.M.00292 ↗ · checked
- Artwork title
- Vampyr / VampireMUNCH · Collection record MM.M.00292 ↗ · checked
- Creation date / period
- 1893MUNCH · Collection record MM.M.00292 ↗ · checked
- Materials & technique
- Oil on canvasMUNCH · Collection record MM.M.00292 ↗ · checked
- Measurements
- 77.5 × 98.5 cm (image)MUNCH · Collection record MM.M.00292 ↗ · checked
- Inscriptions & markings
- UnsignedMUNCH · Collection record MM.M.00292 ↗ · checked
- Catalogue raisonné reference
- Woll M 335MUNCH · Collection record MM.M.00292 ↗ · checked
- Accession / inventory number
- MM.M.00292 · MUNCHMUNCH · Collection record MM.M.00292 ↗ · checked
- Distinguishing features
- Extensive earlier canvas losses were filled and retouched in 1957.MUNCH · Vampire gets new life ↗ · checked
Not documented in this record: subject.
Documented ownership history
- 1944
- 1988-08-22
Returned to the museum after its theft on 23 February 1988.
MUNCH · The Resurrection of Munch’s Vampire ↗ · checked
Only stages supported by the cited sources are shown. This list is not a complete chain of ownership.
Record sources
Identification details follow the Object ID categories where documented. Ownership history is recorded separately; this documentation is not an authentication or a certificate of ownership.
Sources & documentation
- MUNCH: The Resurrection of Munch’s Vampire ↗
- MUNCH: Vampire gets new life ↗
- MUNCH: Vampire in disgrace ↗
- Sotheby’s: reporting from the conservation studio ↗
An original ArtTraceX feature based on the cited sources, checked 9 November 2026. Legends and hypotheses are distinguished from established facts. Images are identified in their captions.



