Art court dispute

US appeals court upholds sanctions in Peter Doig attribution case

Chicago, United States · Source report date:

US appeals court upholds sanctions in Peter Doig attribution case
Notify me about this case

An appellate court upheld a $2.5 million sanctions award in litigation over a landscape signed Pete Doige that a court had found was not painted by Peter Doig. Image of the disputed painting from court documents, via The Art Newspaper.

Artwork Details & DocumentationIdentification, ownership history and supporting records

Individual artwork identification details have not yet been documented in this record. Missing specifications are not inferred from the photograph or report headline.

Not documented in this record: object type · materials & technique · measurements · inscriptions & markings · distinguishing features · artwork title · maker / attribution · creation date / period · subject.

Identification details follow the Object ID categories where documented. Ownership history is recorded separately; this documentation is not an authentication or a certificate of ownership.

Art court dispute

Read the original source · theartnewspaper.com ↗

Rembrandt, Self-Portrait (1630), Nationalmuseum, Stockholm

ArtTraceX Weekly Brief

The week’s key developments in art theft, forgery, recovery, restitution and the courts. Every Monday.

Subscribe →