Art forgery
Equipment forfeiture ruling in Damien Hirst counterfeit case
The Vance v Lopreto decision records a 2017 guilty plea involving counterfeit Hirst prints and false provenance. The 2019 ruling addresses forfeiture of equipment used in the crimes.
Artwork Details & DocumentationIdentification, ownership history and supporting records
Individual artwork identification details have not yet been documented in this record. Missing specifications are not inferred from the photograph or report headline.
Not documented in this record: object type · materials & technique · measurements · inscriptions & markings · distinguishing features · artwork title · maker / attribution · creation date / period · subject.
Record sources
Identification details follow the Object ID categories where documented. Ownership history is recorded separately; this documentation is not an authentication or a certificate of ownership.
