Art court dispute

High Court rules on Christie’s sale of disputed Odalisque

London, United Kingdom · Source report date:

High Court rules on Christie’s sale of disputed Odalisque
Notify me about this case

In Avrora Fine Arts v Christie’s the court held that the painting offered as a work by Boris Kustodiev was not authentic under the auction warranty. Image from the 2005 Christie’s catalogue, which recorded the attribution disputed in court.

Artwork Details & DocumentationIdentification, ownership history and supporting records

Individual artwork identification details have not yet been documented in this record. Missing specifications are not inferred from the photograph or report headline.

Not documented in this record: object type · materials & technique · measurements · inscriptions & markings · distinguishing features · artwork title · maker / attribution · creation date / period · subject.

Identification details follow the Object ID categories where documented. Ownership history is recorded separately; this documentation is not an authentication or a certificate of ownership.

Art court dispute

Read the original source · authenticationinart.org ↗

Rembrandt, Self-Portrait (1630), Nationalmuseum, Stockholm

ArtTraceX Weekly Brief

The week’s key developments in art theft, forgery, recovery, restitution and the courts. Every Monday.

Subscribe →